In response to Jenny Beers's question, "Do you like going to art museums? A lot of people think it is utterly boring, how about you?"...
I honestly have mixed feelings about art museums. Since I am so interested in archeology I enjoy museums such as the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, for it contains a wealth of artifacts as well as a decent sized collection of art as well. In the eighth grade however I did go to the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. This museum was truly impressive and even at that age I was able to appreciate the museum's collection. But, I only spent a few hours there and I am unsure if I would be able to stay longer. Unlike many people who visit these museums, I do not spend twenty minutes looking at one painting. I stop and gaze at one that catches my eye for a minute, then move onto the next one. I do not get bored per say, but I definitely have to be in the mood to visit an art museum. Additionally, I believe that half of the draw of such a museum is the amazing architecture, with the sweeping galleries with their high ceilings. As for modern art at museums such as Mass MoCA, well, I have already blogged about my dislike and misunderstanding of them before.
I tend to find small art galleries more interesting than huge museums of art, and perhaps this is because it is simply enjoying art in smaller doses. This past summer on the way back from Plum Island Beach my two friends and I stopped to browse through downtown Newburyport, Massachusetts. It is a gorgeous little area, and we walked into a couple of small art galleries there. The art was truly magnificent in this one gallery that sticks out in my memory, and I wish I actually had enough money to buy some of the works there. So, I will say that I sometimes enjoy going to art museums, and while I do not find them immediately boring, after a few hours, I do begin to feel that they are. Have you ever seen a famous painting such as the Mona Lisa in person? What did you think of it? Did it live up to your expectations?
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Reflections...
As this semester comes to a close, I find myself at a loss as to what I should blog about. That being said, it is probably best for me to make this post broad and somewhat of a conclusion about my now refined view of human nature. Stepping into the classroom in January, I am sure that most students did not really know what they were in for. After all, "The Nature of Human Nature" sounds pretty vague. But, as the class progressed, I found it increasingly interesting through its discussion of a range of philosophical topics from altruism to the supernatural. Through blogging I have been able to think about these topics fully by applying them to the world around me and drawing examples from my own life in order to understand them. I now realize that human nature is simply those pre-programmed tendencies in our brains that are relatively universal across all humans, no matter what their culture is. As humans, we all act in certain ways and do certain things that we wish we could change. In other words, we discriminate against each other, wage war, and when it comes down to it, we always put our own interests above those of others around us. For thousands of years people have been trying to change these things, but if history can tell us anything, it is that we are most likely not going to change. In general, the broad themes of the future will most likely be extremely similar to those of the past, despite advances in such areas as technology. To quote a Kesha song, "we are who we are" and that is not going to change. Perhaps the best way to improve our future would be to recognize our weaknesses and attempt to modify our behavior so as perhaps it will one day evolve to be different. Do you believe that the human race will ever have the capacity to truly change? Do you believe that our race will ever become extinct?
Friday, May 6, 2011
Is It Possible to Treat Others How You Would Like to Be Treated?
In response to Shannon Ciuk's question, "Do you always treat others in a way that you would want to be treated?"...
To be honest, no. In all actuality, I do not think anyone treats others how they would like to be treated. Situationally, there might be a few instances in which you refrain from acting in some way or stop yourself from saying something, for you realize you should be considerate. But, normally people act very rash, even if they try not to. For instance, imagine you are not on the best terms with your roommate. They have been waking you up in the middle of the night talking loudly on the phone, stealing your cereal, and snoring loudly at night. Essentially, little things are slowly adding up and making you angrier by the day. So, one day you come back from class and they start apologizing to you because they spilt nail polish on your rug. You loose it and scream at them. This is the natural reaction for many people given the circumstances, but imagine you are in the other person's shoes. They have been going through a very rough patch with their boyfriend and when he calls in the night, they get so worked up and forget that you are sleeping. They have no food left, and you had said at the beginning of the year that you would share, so they take a couple bowls of cereal. They have a really bad cold and that is why they have been snoring. As for the nail polish, that truly was an unfortunate accident. But, most people do not immediately think of all of these things. They only would think about how their roommate's actions are impacting them directly, not why the person is doing any of it.
Basically, as much as people might try, it is very difficult to treat people how you want to be treated. In my above example, if you were the roommate, you would want the other to understand why you were doing what you were. Unfortunately, humans fight all the time because though they might deny it, they are all very self-centered. People care for one another, yet they always subconsciously have their own interests in mind. So no, I do not always treat people how I would like to be treated, but this is an unfortunate part of our nature. Do you think it is ever possible for someone to truly live selflessly, always putting others before their own, or will their own interests always take priority over that of others?
To be honest, no. In all actuality, I do not think anyone treats others how they would like to be treated. Situationally, there might be a few instances in which you refrain from acting in some way or stop yourself from saying something, for you realize you should be considerate. But, normally people act very rash, even if they try not to. For instance, imagine you are not on the best terms with your roommate. They have been waking you up in the middle of the night talking loudly on the phone, stealing your cereal, and snoring loudly at night. Essentially, little things are slowly adding up and making you angrier by the day. So, one day you come back from class and they start apologizing to you because they spilt nail polish on your rug. You loose it and scream at them. This is the natural reaction for many people given the circumstances, but imagine you are in the other person's shoes. They have been going through a very rough patch with their boyfriend and when he calls in the night, they get so worked up and forget that you are sleeping. They have no food left, and you had said at the beginning of the year that you would share, so they take a couple bowls of cereal. They have a really bad cold and that is why they have been snoring. As for the nail polish, that truly was an unfortunate accident. But, most people do not immediately think of all of these things. They only would think about how their roommate's actions are impacting them directly, not why the person is doing any of it.
Basically, as much as people might try, it is very difficult to treat people how you want to be treated. In my above example, if you were the roommate, you would want the other to understand why you were doing what you were. Unfortunately, humans fight all the time because though they might deny it, they are all very self-centered. People care for one another, yet they always subconsciously have their own interests in mind. So no, I do not always treat people how I would like to be treated, but this is an unfortunate part of our nature. Do you think it is ever possible for someone to truly live selflessly, always putting others before their own, or will their own interests always take priority over that of others?
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Should We...?
In response to Griffin Thayer's question, "Is it alright to celebrate the death of an enemy?"...
For thousands of years people have had enemies, engaged in war, and fought with each other. As a consequence, billions of people have died because humans are so diverse in their opinions that they cannot get along together. Recently, the U.S. has succeeded in killing Osama Bin Laden. Within minutes that the news broke, my Facebook news feed had dozens of posts celebrating his death. There were a few posts though that condemned people for celebrating. The other day in class it was said that torture and murder are all based off of viewpoint. In other words, while we killed a mortal enemy, we also killed someone's husband. When soldiers are killed in the Middle East, their families are loosing a beloved member. It is all based off of perspective. I believe it is good that he is deceased and no longer a threat, but it does seem strange to celebrate someone's passing. Instead of having riots of celebration, such as there was at UMASS Amherst, perhaps we should just give a satisfied nod and move onto the others we perceive as threats. What bothers me is the fact that people are very quick to identify those they see as their enemies. In reality, we all are humans, and because of that, we should at least try to make an effort to live in peace. It seems like so many do not even want to attempt to do so. Do you think it will ever possible to have universal peace?
For thousands of years people have had enemies, engaged in war, and fought with each other. As a consequence, billions of people have died because humans are so diverse in their opinions that they cannot get along together. Recently, the U.S. has succeeded in killing Osama Bin Laden. Within minutes that the news broke, my Facebook news feed had dozens of posts celebrating his death. There were a few posts though that condemned people for celebrating. The other day in class it was said that torture and murder are all based off of viewpoint. In other words, while we killed a mortal enemy, we also killed someone's husband. When soldiers are killed in the Middle East, their families are loosing a beloved member. It is all based off of perspective. I believe it is good that he is deceased and no longer a threat, but it does seem strange to celebrate someone's passing. Instead of having riots of celebration, such as there was at UMASS Amherst, perhaps we should just give a satisfied nod and move onto the others we perceive as threats. What bothers me is the fact that people are very quick to identify those they see as their enemies. In reality, we all are humans, and because of that, we should at least try to make an effort to live in peace. It seems like so many do not even want to attempt to do so. Do you think it will ever possible to have universal peace?
Creation of Art
Why is it that humans, unlike other species, feel that they need to create art? I really do not know the answer to this question, but it most likely has to do with the size of our brains. Due to our anatomy, it is true that humans have the capacity to accurately understand time. Dogs do not though. When you leave your dog for three days at a time or just for one hour, they believe the same amount of time has past. Humans are able to understand the difference between days, months, and weeks. Also, humans might have the unique ability to create art because of their natural tendency to want to create things: machines, technology, and tools. I remember back on the first day of class people were debating whether or not air conditioning in our homes is "natural." I said that it is, for it is within human nature to want to create things. Consequently, when we have an issue like it being too hot outside we create air conditioners to make ourselves feel more comfortable. When we have an emotional issue that we need to deal with, we create art, using it as a medium of expression.
However, do you think anyone can create "good" art? Additionally, why is it that certain humans seem to be blessed with the ability to create art "better" than others? For that matter, why are people naturally gifted in some fields and not others? I will say that I wish I was good at art. I do play about four instruments and have been in my school band from fifth grade through twelve grade. But, in regards to visual art, while I do have a good eye for some things, overall I am not too good. I took an art class for a couple of months my freshman year of high school, and I was actually praised at being relatively good at all the projects by my teacher. But, I believe my artwork was good more because I was determined and hard working, not that I had any sort of natural ability. I feel like this with a great deal of things in life. I work extremely hard in school, and therefore get all A's. Although, I have never been like some of my friends who will work on a paper an hour before class and receive and A on it. I write my papers at least a week in advance and edit them on average three times. I get an A on them, yet I cannot help but to wish I had the capacity to do less work and still get the same grade.
However, do you think anyone can create "good" art? Additionally, why is it that certain humans seem to be blessed with the ability to create art "better" than others? For that matter, why are people naturally gifted in some fields and not others? I will say that I wish I was good at art. I do play about four instruments and have been in my school band from fifth grade through twelve grade. But, in regards to visual art, while I do have a good eye for some things, overall I am not too good. I took an art class for a couple of months my freshman year of high school, and I was actually praised at being relatively good at all the projects by my teacher. But, I believe my artwork was good more because I was determined and hard working, not that I had any sort of natural ability. I feel like this with a great deal of things in life. I work extremely hard in school, and therefore get all A's. Although, I have never been like some of my friends who will work on a paper an hour before class and receive and A on it. I write my papers at least a week in advance and edit them on average three times. I get an A on them, yet I cannot help but to wish I had the capacity to do less work and still get the same grade.
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
More on Torture...
While browsing my Yahoo homepage on my computer I found this article that is quite interesting given our discussions on torture and the recent death of Osama Bin Laden:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20110504/ts_yblog_thelookout/bin-laden-killing-wont-settle-debate-over-enhanced-interrogations
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20110504/ts_yblog_thelookout/bin-laden-killing-wont-settle-debate-over-enhanced-interrogations
Uncomfortable Art
In response to Jenny Beers's question, "How do you react to art that makes you uncomfortable? Do you like how it evokes that emotion in you or do you find yourself wanting to get away from it and not consider it art at all?"...
I will admit it, I do not like art that makes me uncomfortable. In other words, Mass MoCA is not my favorite place to be, for I do not understand how most of what is inside is categorized as art. I suppose I just have a problem with modern art that looks as if I could have made it myself. So, slapping a few ordinary objects onto a canvas and attaching it to a wall is something that is rather unimpressive to me. I took Art and Philosophy last semester, but this still did nothing to aid in my appreciation for modern art. I still hate the uncomfortable feelings art gives us and do not consider all such things art. This might make me sound close-minded, but it seems that over the years art has come to include such a broad range of things, and it is questionable as if it should. This is part of my definition of art:
"Through my eyes, art can be defined as an artifact that is the product of an act of creativity. When someone creates such an artifact with the intention of it being an art piece, or identifies an ordinary functioning object as having aesthetic pleasure, they then place it in a museum and/or assure that it is presented to viewers. This object then becomes art because society accepts it as such."
However, I now question whether this definition was too radically inclusive. I did say at the end of my piece that the definition of art does need to be relative inclusive for some things are not meant to be definied or understood in this world. Basically, some art may make me feel uncomfortable, but that is its intention, no matter whether or not anyone agrees with it. The world is the way it is, and unless modern art or other art that makes us uneasy decreases dramatically in popularity, it will be around for many years to come, whether we like it or not. Do you like modern art? If you do, what do you like about it?
I will admit it, I do not like art that makes me uncomfortable. In other words, Mass MoCA is not my favorite place to be, for I do not understand how most of what is inside is categorized as art. I suppose I just have a problem with modern art that looks as if I could have made it myself. So, slapping a few ordinary objects onto a canvas and attaching it to a wall is something that is rather unimpressive to me. I took Art and Philosophy last semester, but this still did nothing to aid in my appreciation for modern art. I still hate the uncomfortable feelings art gives us and do not consider all such things art. This might make me sound close-minded, but it seems that over the years art has come to include such a broad range of things, and it is questionable as if it should. This is part of my definition of art:
"Through my eyes, art can be defined as an artifact that is the product of an act of creativity. When someone creates such an artifact with the intention of it being an art piece, or identifies an ordinary functioning object as having aesthetic pleasure, they then place it in a museum and/or assure that it is presented to viewers. This object then becomes art because society accepts it as such."
However, I now question whether this definition was too radically inclusive. I did say at the end of my piece that the definition of art does need to be relative inclusive for some things are not meant to be definied or understood in this world. Basically, some art may make me feel uncomfortable, but that is its intention, no matter whether or not anyone agrees with it. The world is the way it is, and unless modern art or other art that makes us uneasy decreases dramatically in popularity, it will be around for many years to come, whether we like it or not. Do you like modern art? If you do, what do you like about it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)